|
|
Donate to OnlyHuckabee.com |
|
|
Keep
the Huckaball rolling!
Join the ONLY HUCKABEE REVOLUTION
by filling out the form to the right. Your name will appear below along
with other voters who are determined to vote only for Mike Huckabee as
President of the United States of America and no one else. The voter list below is updated every 24 hours, so check back daily as we turn the tables on the "conservative" establishment. Current number of "OnlyHuckabee" voters: 2,181 click here to view Voter Roll Buy Mike Huckabee books here! New Section: OnlyHuckabee Archives Latest Headlines...
Mike Huckabee on Fox and Friends 5/7/08 Part I
Part II Part III Is GOP too biased to tap Huckabee as VP? link to original source  While Democrats duel, the
unofficial Republican nominee considers a
vice president. John McCain should start by asking what he needs. The
admiral’s son fits two legs of his own party’s three-legged stool:
foreign policy (zinging terrorism) and economic (scoring spending).
Alas, he is out to sea with social and cultural conservatives, the one
group without which national Republicans once routinely lost, and will
surely lose again.According to a new Pew Research Forum poll, 44 percent of the electorate terms itself “born-again.” Politically, these Christian, mostly Protestant, evangelicals are the Republican Party’s largest block: 35 percent of George W. Bush’s 2004 vote. More “born-agains” voted then than all blacks and union members. Moreover, their scorn of secularism, cultural rot and border insecurity tracks the concerns of millions of Catholic, orthodox Jewish and Protestant non-evangelicals. Prsident Bush coined the term “coalition of the willing.” Born-agains and their friends form the GOP coalition of the winning. In 2000, McCain attacked evangelical “agents of tolerance.” Mending fences, he still spurns such “values” issues as elitism, political correctness and hostility by state toward church. Equally unconcerned is daughter Meghan, 23, telling GQ that she likes “bad boys” with tattoos, “bisexual-dating TV,” stripper Dita Von Teese, and “The Big Lebowski” — “I love that [expletive] movie!” Both seem blind to how social/cultural conservatives, tilting Republican, have tipped America to the GOP. This drift began in the 1960s. Candidates ignoring it lose: Gerald Ford, Robert Dole and George H. W. Bush in 1992. By contrast, evangelicals helped Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan win 49 states. Bestriding the South, born-agains also pivot states like Missouri, Iowa, central Pennsylvania and rural Ohio (only the anti-gay marriage turnout saved Bush in 2004). Without them, Republicans are less a majority party than the Federalists or Whigs. This year, voting born-agains have treated McCain like Ford or Dole. Some suggest McCain do an extreme values makeover. It would flop — McCain’s a lousy actor — or worse, harm his maverick niche. Others dismiss values voters, wanting an economic conservative vice president where McCain is already strong. Instead, he needs a running mate with social/ cultural cachet, swelling turnout without changing the Arizonan’s crucial straight-talk front. Only Mike Huckabee can sufficiently help McCain where McCain cannot. More than any Republican, Arkansas’ ex-governor embodies a silent still-majority trying to save money, buy a home and educate its children. “When you struggle, you look at things different,” said the son of a firefighter who worked “a second job from the shipyard, not Harvard Yard.” This spring, “entering political folklore,” said CNN’s Lou Dobbs, Huckabee became politics’ David versus Goliath — eight primary and caucus victories, 15 seconds and nearly 4 million votes. As vice president, he would be ready to elect McCain from day one. In 1960, John F. Kennedy stumped the Northeast, industrial Midwest and West Coast, assigning the South to Lyndon Johnson: sans him, Nixon would have won. Likewise, Huckabee would help sweep Dixie and periphery, wooing people less worried about stock portfolio than human stock — their family. Unlike any other vice president, he would let McCain, running left-of-center, focus exclusively on Blue states from New Jersey to Oregon. In the South, the Arkansan, running right, would become almost a surrogate No. 1. Such amalgams are hard to find. Specifically, Huckabee would clinch what McCain aides wrongly “believe that he has already won,” the Wall Street Journal says of bornagains. Despite his recent “guns and religion” gaffe, Barack Obama could loosen such evangelical states as Tennessee, Georgia, North Carolina and even Mississippi. Recently, Houston TV megachurch pastor Joel Osteen lauded Hillary Clinton for “all you’ve done for America.” Kennedy’s fire wall was LBJ. Huckabee would be McCain’s. Overnight he would make the Republicans’ largest block a GOP pro, not con. George Will thinks “It would be reassuring were [McCain] to select a running mate with executive experience.” Huckabee’s experience dwarfs any potential vice president or president, making Time magazine’s 2005 list of “America’s five best governors.” Another edge is his TV wizardry: acing countless interviews; pitch perfect defending McCain versus the New York Times; excelling in each 2007-08 debate. It is easy to see McCain stumbling in debates this fall. It is even easier to picture Huckabee — another fire wall — trouncing the Democrats’ No. 2. Finally, McCain and Huckabee like each other, each running a valiant bare-boned campaign, their synergy miming the 1992 Clinton-Gore ticket larger than the sum of its parts. On one hand, Huckabee avoids the me-tooism dooming Ford, Dole and the elder Bush. On the other, the social, economic and foreign policy conservative reaches across the aisle. Four times Huckabee won 4-to-1 Democratic Arkansas, including 40 percent of black voters — unheard of in today’s GOP. Last year, spurning party talking points, he prophesied, “The economy’s in trouble.” Defining a Republican “Big Tent,” Huckabee would show that its Big Top isn’t closed. Main Street wants a running mate to address, among other things, wage disparity, foreclosure and U. S. sovereignty. Huckabee does. Other rumored vice presidents ape Wall Street from globalism to Nasdaq mania. Florida Gov. Charlie Crist caricatures corporate Republicanism with a George Hamilton tan. Mitt Romney would be perfect if each family earned $300,000. Condoleezza Rice symbolizes her reviled boss and friend. Others hail from states McCain could carry with Jack Abramoff as No. 2: Mississippi’s Haley Barbour, Oklahoma’s Tom Coburn, Utah’s Jon Huntsman Jr., South Carolina’s Mark Sanford. Why not clinch Idaho by picking Larry Craig? Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty couldn’t deliver for McCain on Super Tuesday. Ex-Cincinnati Congressman Rob Portman is unknown in next-door Kentucky. Some hallucinate that ex-SEC head Chris Cox can make California competitive. Maybe McCain plans to revisit amnesty. Each would-be veep helps only with the GOP establishment. Unlike Huckabee, none helps beyond his state. Twelve years ago, facing a similar choice, Dole tapped Beltway favorite Jack Kemp, whom Will soon dubbed “incoherent.” Incoherent would be McCain ditching a middle-class base that works, for a Fortune 500 base that doesn’t. Huckabee belongs to — thus, grasps — the coalition of the winning. So did another governor who, more than anyone, made evangelicals Republican. Some call Huckabee as governor a “liberal” for raising taxes. If so, Gov. Ronald Reagan was a greater liberal, having raised them more. Blue states allegedly feel Huckabee extreme. GOP 1970s elites dubbed Reagan a right-wing nut. Huckabee lacks deep foreign policy bona fides. Henry Kissinger called Reagan “ill-informed.” Reagan would understand Huckabee’s rapport: also, how objections are largely sham — a smoke screen for religious bias. Reagan’s evangelical mother taught him to hate bigotry. Ironically, the sole obstacle to Vice President Huckabee may be evangelism itself. Leftists bash born-agains and friends — the “religious right” — with relish and regularity. Equally toxic is the GOP’s official and/or neoconservative establishment deeming them, as writer Ring Lardner said, a side dish they decline to order. “Many secular Republicans have contempt for evangelicals,” MSNBC’s Tucker Carlson said. “They want values voters to vote, then disappear” — redolent of GOP bias against Jews and Catholics in the 1940s and ’50s. Ex-Bush staffer David Kuo’s “Tempting Faith” bared administration disdain for born-agains. Revealingly, the sole cable news network to boycott the book was Fox. Likewise, people “who think summer is a verb,” jokes Huckabee, fear him becoming the elephant in the room. Many neocons don’t mention Huckabee among vice presidents. Fox’s Britt Hume mocks, “We’ll miss the Huck.” Republicans rarely term John Danforth or Joe Lieberman an Episcopalian minister or observant Jew, respectively. Yet they call Huckabee a “former Baptist preacher” — he hasn’t officiated since 1988 — seeking to ghettoize, thus stigmatize. “They couch their fears in secular terms,” wrote Newsweek’s Howard Fineman. “Privately, however, what worries the [Republican] insiders is that [Huckabee’s religion will make] Blue and Purple America run shrieking” from the party. Clearly, GOP elites feel a declasse faith is worse than none. For born-agains, such animus may be a turning point — a cause to say “no mas.” Huckabee’s edge in rhetoric, recognition, executive skill and populism likely will soon become irrefutable. Say that McCain then spurns politics’ Sea Biscuit for Sanford’s Mr. Ed. The snub will be seen as prejudice against nearly one in two Americans: a last GOP insult to family, sanctity of life and religion in the public square. Some GOP evangelical dons might shrug, preferring access to principle. By contrast, rank-and-file would stay home, or vote Democratic, crippling McCain. It needn’t come to that. Asked to draw McCain’s ideal running mate, you would create Huckabee. Put another way, if Huckabee didn’t exist, we would have to invent him. Happily, he does. All McCain has to do is pick him. Ambivalent NC voter chose Huckabee link to original source  Millie Seifert finally made a
choice. She voted for the ghost.In the last week, The Associated Press talked to some respondents to a continuing series of AP-Yahoo News polls to see how they planned to vote in the primaries Tuesday in Indiana and North Carolina. Several were undecided until practically the last minute. One was particularly troubled by how tough it was to come to a decision. Here's what they did: Millie Seifert, 69, of East Bend, N.C. A retired pharmacy technician who supplements her Social Security income by working as a nanny. The choices: Seifert liked Republican Mike Huckabee until he dropped out. Then she was drawn to Democrat Barack Obama until his former preacher made waves. She was ambivalent about Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton, disliking her personally but admiring her grit. She was going back and forth — and back and forth — between Clinton in the Democratic race and John McCain in the noncompetitive GOP primary. "Every time I leave the house I change my mind," she said earlier. "I'm just so confused." The decision: She voted for Huckabee, who was still on the ballot despite leaving the race two months ago. "He was the one who I wanted in there to begin with." If she had voted Democratic, she would have gone with Clinton. Huckabee places second in Indiana, NC primaries link to original source  Amid the chatter about whether
the Democrats would be able to unite
around one of their candidates was an interesting nugget. Incomplete
returns on Tuesday night showed that more than 20 percent of those who
voted in the Republican primary in Indiana voted for someone other than
Senator John McCain, the party’s presumptive nominee.With 74 percent of the state reporting, Mr. McCain was winning Indiana with 77.3 percent of the vote, according to The Associated Press. That would be considered a robust margin on most election nights. But consider the competition. Mike Huckabee, who dropped out of the race two months ago and has campaigned for Mr. McCain, received 10.3 percent of the vote. Another McCain supporter, Mitt Romney, who dropped out of the race even earlier, won 4.8 percent. And Representative Ron Paul of Texas, whose unconventional campaign has often drawn to the polls people who do not normally vote in Republican primaries, received 7.6 percent. Quite a few Republican crossover voters participated in the Democratic primary. One in 10 of the voters who cast ballots in the Democratic primary identified themselves to exit pollsters as Republicans. Mr. McCain and his aides have said they are pleased with the way the Republican Party has united around his candidacy since he became the presumptive nominee in early March. They note that polls show them doing as well with Republicans as President Bush did at similar points in his first campaign for president, if not better. But nonexistent or marginal competitors continue to draw votes in the primaries. The situation was similar on Tuesday in North Carolina, where, with 54 percent of the precincts reporting, Mr. McCain had 73.8 percent of the vote, Mr. Huckabee 12.1 percent, Mr. Paul 7.7 percent, and others 6.3 percent. The pattern seems to have been established last month, when Mr. McCain won just under 73 percent of the vote in the Pennsylvania primary. Huckabee and the "language of Zion" link to original source  Over lunch last week,
former presidential candidate Mike Huckabee
and I reflected on how beneficial—and how costly—a single phrase can
be. It may even be why he's referred to now as a "former" presidential
candidate.The phrase came from a speech Huckabee gave last fall at the Values Voters Summit in Washington, D.C. That's where he brought the crowd to its feet when he said: "It's important that the language of Zion is a mother tongue, and not a recently acquired second language." Huckabee's line was a huge winner with his audience that evening, setting the stage for him to make a strategic move from being a back-row also-ran to the ranks of the "Big Three," along with John McCain and Mitt Romney, in the Republican race. In retrospect, though, the smoothly memorable line about the language of Zion may have been costly. There are those (and the Republican Party is still full of such people) who get downright nervous when they hear that language being spoken—and especially so when it is spoken as a mother tongue, which is exactly how Mike Huckabee speaks it. The modern Republican Party—or, you might say, the modern conservative movement—is made up of three components: (1) those who see it as critical that America maintains a dominant military defense in a threatening world; (2) those who want to limit the role of government in the nation's economy; and (3) social conservatives who want to put the brakes on the government's encouragement of a libertine lifestyle. It was, quite demonstrably, the coalition of those three groups that enabled Ronald Reagan and his ideas to establish the significant electoral majorities he enjoyed. Group 3 in this coalition pretty typically also holds to the principles of Groups 1 and 2. But Groups 1 and 2 not only can't always be assumed to hold the values of Group 3, they are often embarrassed by them. So no one doubts that for everyone in Group 3 who was reassured by Huckabee's "language of Zion" reference, there were those in Groups 1 and 2 who shivered and shook at the prospect of a former Baptist preacher who might end up embarrassing them silly. Word went out that fine a fellow as Huckabee might be, he might be a little soft on national defense and immigration. Straight arrow that he was on abortion and marriage, aren't you a little worried that he's something of a free spender? Well, you expect that in politics—and especially on the grand national scale of a presidential campaign. What did surprise Huckabee, though, was the number of Group 3 leaders who seemed just as embarrassed to embrace a fellow evangelical—even while he was winning majority delegations in seven different states—as were some of the secular leaders of Groups 1 and 2. "They ended up worshipping at the altar of electability," Huckabee told me. Rather than rejoicing at the tones and tunes of Zion, they self-consciously distanced themselves from the very guy they said they were looking for. Or, in the case of a few, they joined in the singing only on the last measure of the last verse. A little better attendance at choir practice might have made quite a difference in South Carolina, Missouri, and the whole campaign. I'm not arguing that it's essential for an effective presidency that the White House be made the site of regular hymn-sings. But I am noting, for the record, that we're left now with three major candidates who show us repeatedly how hard it is for them to carry this particular tune. And I am saying that when we end up complaining that our next president is tone deaf—especially with reference to the songs of Zion—we'll have to think long and hard about the awkward and hesitant role played by some folks many had assumed to be the main choir directors. Huckabee releases Oklahoma delegates to McCain link to original source  Former Arkansas Gov. and GOP
presidential contender Mike Huckabee has
released the Oklahoma delegates he won during the state's presidential
primary this year.Huckabee encouraged the six delegates he won to vote for Republican presumptive presidential nominee John McCain, said Gary Jones, the chairman of the Oklahoma Republican Party. Jones said Monday he has contacted Huckabee's delegates and "all but one” of them said they would vote for McCain. The other delegate is going to vote for U.S. Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, who is continuing his presidential bid despite dropping out of recent primaries. If that holds true, 40 of Oklahoma's 41 GOP votes to be cast during the Republican National Convention in September will be for McCain, a U.S. senator from Arizona, Jones said. Paul, who did not win a delegate during Oklahoma's Feb. 5 presidential primary, would get one vote. McCain earned 23 delegates for winning Oklahoma's primary, and nine other delegates for winning three congressional districts. Huckabee finished second in the primary, but earned six delegates for winning two congressional districts. Oklahoma has three additional delegates — Jones and two national committee members — who are committed to McCain. Next up: Romney vs. Huckabee link to original source  John McCain may be the
presumptive Republican presidential nominee, but
a struggle to determine who will carry the conservative mantle into the
future rages just below the surface of his success. The contestants’
faces will look familiar: former Govs. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts and
Mike Huckabee of Arkansas, also-rans from the 2008 GOP primary scrum.During the nominating race, obloquy was understandable. The other Republican candidates personally liked working-class son Huckabee, and they seemed to resent the wealthy and handsome Romney. And because they were both attempting to establish themselves as the conservative alternative to McCain, it’s not surprising that they sometimes clashed over turf. What’s more, by staying in the race when McCain began to surge, Huckabee arguably split the conservative vote in states like South Carolina, presumably siphoning off votes from Romney and handing the nomination to the Arizona senator. (Huckabee would argue it was Romney who siphoned off his votes.) While this environment was ripe for a Romney/Huckabee feud during the campaign, the stakes are just as high now, as both see the 71-year-old McCain — who still faces a tough general election — as merely keeping the seat warm for them. Based on their performance in the primary campaign, each believes he has earned the right to be the conservative heir apparent. Romney chose the symbolically significant Conservative Political Action Conference as his venue to graciously withdraw from the race. Meanwhile, Huckabee, a former Baptist preacher, is similarly charismatic, and he can point to the fact that he outlasted the other Republican candidates, save Texas Rep. Ron Paul. One front in this political war is being waged over the vice presidency. It’s hard to deny the second slot can be a road to the White House. While neither Romney nor Huckabee may get the nod, the veep “race” provides a unique opportunity for both candidates to continue “campaigning.” This, of course, means they can stay in the limelight — and also continue building lists of supporters and possible donors. While both Romney and Huckabee have legitimate claims as the conservative heir apparent, they also both have problems to expiate, and both appear to be attempting to nullify their weaknesses. In the face of “flip-flop” allegations, Romney continues to buttress his conservative — and especially anti-abortion — credentials. Last year, he received an award from the Massachusetts Citizens for Life. On May 8, the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty will honor him with its Canterbury Medal. While Huckabee’s social conservative bona fides are strong, he was attacked by fiscal conservatives for raising taxes as governor. During the nominating race, he attempted to minimize this by championing the Fair Tax. But this has also likely influenced the direction of his “post-campaign” campaign. For example, while many conservatives hoped Huckabee would found a group to fill the void that has been left by the once powerful, but now moribund, Christian Coalition, he instead launched “Huck PAC.” Huck PAC’s website lists its mission as supporting “Republican candidates who are passionate advocates for tax reform, a strong national defense, real border security, life, the family, less government and individual liberty.” While this is all consistent with conservative thought, one might expect Huckabee to put social issues at the forefront. Instead, he appears to be highlighting his fiscal positions. If one doubts the validity of the Romney/Huckabee battle, consider what has occurred in just the last month among proxies for the former presidential hopefuls. (Note: It is unclear whether these actions bore the candidate’s imprimatur.) The opening salvo was fired by the Government Is Not God PAC, an organization composed largely of Huckabee supporters. On April 4, the group announced publicly it would run newspaper advertisements aimed at discouraging McCain from picking Romney as his VP. “Gov. Romney got no traction during the primaries simply because his recent ‘conversion’ to conservative and pro-life principles is not credible,” the ad said.On April 23, Romney supporters officially launched a website, MittforVeep.com. That same night, Huckabee garnered 11 percent of the vote in the Pennsylvania GOP primary election, though balloting was a mere technicality. And the very next day, Huckabee supporters launched their own website, Huck4America.com. Taking a presumed swipe at Romney, Huck4America.com included a message to McCain: “There are rumors that you are considering a choice that would be more moderate on these core issues. Candidates that are, for example, not necessarily pro-life. ... It is important to have a vice president whose record has been consistently pro-life, not coming to the party simply to run for national office.” Later that day, one of the Arkansas Times’ blogs reported McCain staffers were angry over a “Promote Mike Huckabee rally at the Capital Hotel less than a week before McCain’s visit to Arkansas.” And if anyone doubts Huckabee’s penchant for self-promotion, the former governor also recently announced he was writing a book about his failed presidential campaign. But the VP race is only one facet of the ongoing Romney/Huckabee grudge match. Each aims to establish himself as the leader of the conservative movement to set himself up for future presidential bids, as Ronald Reagan did after narrowly losing the 1976 Republican nomination to President Gerald Ford. Republicans have a penchant for nominating candidates who have run before — twice before, in some cases (Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Bob Dole and Richard Nixon). Romney, 61, and Huckabee, 52, are both in the prime of their political lives. Both came essentially out of nowhere to run highly respectable campaigns. Barring some seismic shift, it is conceivable these two will once again face off, be it in 2012 or in 2016. Huckabee to rock in Redmond link to original source  A former Arkansas governor is
teaming up with a famous rock band
drummer in a benefit concert in Redmond this month.It’s not Bill Clinton. Mike Huckabee, the former governor and Republican presidential candidate, is scheduled to take part in a May 22 fundraiser for a group trying to raise money for music programs through the sale of a special license plate. Huckabee once played in a band called Capitol Offense. This time he is slated to jam with drummer Alan White , best known for his work with Yes, plus Bob and Shelley Tomberg of Shelley and the Curves. Music Aid Northwest is behind the program of selling license plates to boost music education and organizers of the concert. This is not a political group. They're all about the music. Find out more on the license plate program here and the group here. Huckabee will be keynote at Mobile fundraiser this fall link to original source  Former Republican presidential
hopeful Mike Huckabee will be the
keynote speaker at the fourth annual University of Mobile Scholarship
Banquet on Sept. 25.Tickets are on sale now. The event raises financial support for the university’s annual academic scholarship fund while bringing a speaker of national prominence to the Mobile area. Sponsorship packages range from $1,250 to $20,000 for tables of eight, with various benefits for different sponsorship levels. Individual tickets are $175 per person. To purchase tickets or discuss sponsorship opportunities, call the UM Development Office at (251) 442-2226 or email mpittman@umobile.edu. For more about the banquet, visit the University of Mobile website at http://www.umobile.edu/banquet. Students in the school’s Center for Performing Arts will provide entertainment at the event, which will be held at the Arthur R. Outlaw Mobile Convention Center in Mobile. Huckabee, Davis visit Columbus link to original source  Where there's a festival
during election season, there's bound to be a politician.Former Republican Presdential Candidate Mike Huckabee was campaigning with Greg Davis in Columbus during today's Market Street Festival. Davis shook hands with supporters and got his message out to first congressional district voeters in the friendly city, but the presidential race was also a hot topic. "John McCain has to be the happiest guy in America. Seeing the constant bickering between Obama and Clinton. And also Americans finally beginning to realize that Senator Obama is a very left of center candidate," said former Presidential Candidate Mike Huckabee. "Unfortunately Federal Law prohibits us from even knowing what activities they will be doing, whether it be a mail-out, phone call, or a TV commercial. So until the law is changed we can't know what's on until everyone else does," said 1st Congressional District Candidate Greg Davis. New Mike Huckabee videos Mike on the importance of voting Mike on Greg Davis Sign the "Pass the FairTax" Petition
 If you're not already
familiar with the FairTax, here are the basics:The FairTax plan is a comprehensive proposal that replaces all federal income and payroll based taxes with an integrated approach including: 1. A progressive national retail sales tax. 2. A prebate to ensure no American pays federal taxes on spending up to the poverty level. 3. Dollar-for-dollar federal revenue neutrality. 4. Repeal of the 16th Amendment Just imagine...bringing home your entire paycheck AND never having to file a tax return again! It's not a dream. It's called the FairTax, and you can help make it a reality. If this sounds interesting, you can learn more at www.fairtax.org, and sign the "Pass the FairTax" petition there as well. |
 Join the cause... Fill out the form below.
Be sure to put "Huck" in the security code box so we know you are a
real person and not a robot from the future. The voter roll is
updated every 24 hours.
The OnlyHuckabee.com widget below is now available. Copy the code below the image to embed on your website. Thanks to Dale for creating this artwork. 
Caution: You are about to enter a gun-free zone by Mike Adams link to original source  I don’t have to remind my
readers that I spend a good bit of my time
disagreeing with campus leftists. Nor do I need to remind them that
most of these disagreements are with leftist professors. But, until
now, I haven’t written about one of the subjects upon which we
frequently disagree. That is the subject of whether deterrence theory
“works.”Conservatives and leftists (I have a hard time calling them liberals because of their fascistic tendencies) have a fundamentally different view of human nature. Leftists see humans as innately good. That is why they think rehabilitation works. It is also why they think the United Nations is a good idea. If people are innately good then, surely, they can talk out their problems without resorting to war. But conservatives have a more tragic view of human nature. We believe that people with innately destructive tendencies must be held in check. That is why we so frequently speak of traditional values. That is why we also speak of the need to have a punitive criminal justice system, which serves as a back-up plan when traditional values fail. The ideal system would mete out punishment that is swift, certain, and severe. In a nutshell, conservatives believe the Reagan military build-up produced the fall of the Berlin Wall. And we believe that criminals, like communists, are on their best behavior when they are afraid. Ever since I began my transformation from leftist atheist to conservative Christian I’ve been arguing with professors inclined to dismiss deterrence theory. Those professors usually fall into one of two groups. First, there are those who name a specific “get tough” program that they believe “hasn’t worked.” Second, there are those who just blandly assert that deterrence theory, in general, “doesn’t work.” Today, I plan to respond to both of these groups. Let me start with the second group. Every time I hear a professor say that deterrence theory “doesn’t work” I log on to his university web page to peruse his syllabi. And in each instance I find evidence that he really does believe in the efficacy of deterrence theory. That evidence comes in many forms such the assertion that “plagiarism will be punished under the academic honor code” or “those who miss more than two classes will have three points deducted from his or her final average.” Obviously, these professors seek to deter cheating and skipping class through the medium of punishment, not negotiation. That means the professors are hypocrites – not because they fail to live up to the things they say but because they do not even believe them in the first place.  It is better to ignore these
hypocrites altogether. But those in the
aforementioned first group should be taken more seriously. Since they
tend to rely on specific empirical data rather than broad theoretical
assertions, I now invite them to participate in a little experiment
meant to assess whether specific measures based on deterrence theory
actually “work.”I want all of those leftist professors who say that having a gun in one’s home does not deter burglary to do the following: 1. Post a sign on your front door saying “Caution: You Are About to Enter a Gun Free Zone.” 2. Send a post card to DrAdams.org, P.O. Box 319, Wrightsville Beach, NC, 28480. Just note that you have posted your sign and leave a return address so I can mail you a crime victimization survey this time next year. Next, I want all of those gun owners who say that having a gun in one’s home does, in fact, deter burglary to do the following: 1. Post a sign on your front door saying “Caution: You Are About to Enter an Armed Household.” 2. Send a post card to DrAdams.org, P.O. Box 319, Wrightsville Beach, NC, 28480. Just note that you have posted your sign and leave a return address so I can mail you a crime victimization survey this time next year. There are also professors who continue to assert that actually carrying a weapon with a valid permit does not deter violent crime. For those, it will not be necessary to conduct a crime victimization study. There are already 15 refereed studies indicating that concealed carry permits reduce violent crime. While some published studies are inconclusive, none draw the conclusion that the permits increase violence. Nonetheless, some leftist professors continue to use scare tactics by ignoring the evidence and claiming that concealed carry permits do increase violence. Such assertions are immoral because they are dishonest. Such assertions are also careless because even those without guns are safer living in areas that allow citizens to carry concealed. This is because violent criminals do not know who has a gun and who does not. But, today, I plan to change all that by asking these leftists professors to write to DrAdams.org to re-assert their opposition to concealed carry laws. After they send a post card to the address supplied above, I’ll send them a free t-shirt saying “Caution: I’m an Un-Armed Citizen.” If they get into trouble wearing it, they can always negotiate their way out of the situation. Polar Bear Politics by Robert Bluey link to original source  Talk about bad timing. Gas
prices are spiking and U.S. energy policy is
contributing to skyrocketing food costs, yet environmentalists
apparently want to make it even more expensive to live in America. And
they’re trying to use the polar bear to do it.A federal judge in California ruled last week that the Bush administration must decide by May 15 whether to list the polar bear under the Endangered Species Act because of global warming. The upcoming deadline is fueling fears that Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne could cave to left-wing environmentalists.  Listing the polar bear as a
threatened species would be a devastating
blow for U.S. energy exploration and a boon to global-warming alarmists.The classification would open the door for environmentalists to challenge any new forms of energy production -- including oil exploration in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) or new power plants and factories that emit fossil fuels. It also would jeopardize a highly promising arrangement in Alaska’s Chukchi Sea, which contains an estimated 15 billion barrels of oil and 76 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. Now is not the time to cut back on domestic oil production. With gas prices soaring to nearly $4 per gallon in some parts of the country, there’s hardly been a better time to embark on energy exploration in the United States to reduce our dependence on foreign oil. “Alaska is America’s last best frontier for domestic oil and natural gas,” Ben Lieberman of The Heritage Foundation said in arguing against the polar bear’s listing. “Closing off these potential resources would add to energy prices for decades to come and increase reliance on imports.” Worse still is that classifying the polar bear as threatened under the Endangered Species Act would put America’s energy policy in the hands of activist judges. Environmentalists who want to halt construction of a power plant in Minnesota, for instance, could simply run to court complaining how it would harm the polar bear. Liberal environmentalists who are lobbying for the polar bear’s listing insist that it’s necessary. “We hope that this decision marks the end of the Bush administration’s delays and denial so that immediate action may be taken to protect polar bears from extinction,” said Melanie Duchin of Greenpeace. Added Kassie Siegel of the Center for Biological Diversity: “The polar bear should receive the protections it deserves under the Endangered Species Act, which is the first step toward saving the polar bear and the entire Arctic ecosystem from global warming.” But environmentalists conveniently ignore the facts about the bears’ growing populations in Alaska, Canada, Russia and other countries. According to the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, between 20,000 to 25,000 polar bears live around the world today, up significantly from the 8,000 to 10,000 in the 1960s. The alarmist views about global warming clearly don’t jive with the facts. Our neighbors to the north in Canada also recognize the polar bear isn’t threatened or endangered. In fact, Canada’s Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife, an independent group of scientists, said last month the bears deserve merely “special concern” status, the weakest classification in Canada. “Based on the best available information at hand, there was insufficient reason to think that the polar bear was at imminent risk of extinction,” wrote committee chairman Jeffrey Hutchings.  Some Canadians wouldn’t even go
as far as the scientists. The Inuit
Indians depend on the polar bear for their livelihood. An endangerment
listing would be devastating for the tribe. “We don’t believe the
scientists’ information any more. [Hunters] will ignore new quotas,”
said Jayko Alooloo of the Hunters and Trappers Organization in Pond
Inlet to The Canadian Press.Rarely does the United States follow Canada’s lead, but this is certainly a case to do just that. As pressure mounts on Secretary Kempthorne to act, he needs to weigh the devastating consequences that listing the bear could have on the American people. The polar bear’s growing population, coupled with the likely litigation that would result from its listing, are sound reasons to leave it off the endangered species list. Tall Tales about Tuskegeee by Jonah Goldberg link to original source  “Based on this Tuskegee
experiment ... I believe our government is
capable of doing anything.”So said the Rev. Jeremiah Wright when asked if he stood by his claim that “the government lied about inventing the HIV virus as a means of genocide against people of color.” The infamous Tuskegee experiment is the Medusa’s head of black left-wing paranoia. Whenever someone laments the fact that anywhere from 10 percent to 33 percent of African-Americans believe the U.S. government invented AIDS to kill blacks, someone will say, “That’s not so crazy when you consider what happened at Tuskegee.” But it is crazy. And it’s dishonest. Wright says the U.S. government “purposely infected African-American men with syphilis.” This is a lie, and no knowledgeable historian says otherwise. And yet, this untruth pops up routinely. In March, CNN commentator Roland Martin defended Wright, saying, “That actually did, indeed, happen.” On Fox News, the allegation has gone unchallenged on “Hannity & Colmes” and “The O’Reilly Factor.” Obery Hendricks, a prominent author and visiting scholar at Princeton University, told O’Reilly “I do know that the government injected syphilis into black men at the Tuskegee Institute. Now we know that the government is capable of doing those things.” To which O’Reilly responded: “All right. All governments have done bad things in every country.” True enough. And what the U.S. did at Tuskegee was indeed bad, very bad. But it didn’t do what these people say it did.  So what did happen? In 1932,
public health researchers set out to study
syphilis, particularly among African-Americans, who had higher
infection rates than whites. They recruited 399 black men who already
had syphilis. The doctors infected no one. In fact, the patients were
selected in the first place because they were tertiary-stage
syphilitics who were no longer contagious.The researchers studied the progress of the disease, without treating it, for 40 years. Prior to the availability of penicillin in the 1940s and 1950s, the researchers couldn’t have treated the men even if they wanted to. Even after standardized penicillin treatments were available, it wasn’t clear that the patients could have been helped. Some of the doctors believed that treating the decades-long infections would kill the men. Among scholars who’ve studied Tuskegee, there’s a lot of debate about how much — if any — racism was involved in the experiment. But no one disputes that Tuskegee had nothing whatsoever to do with genocide or even a desire to spread the disease among the black population. What was bad about the Tuskegee experiment was a callous disregard for the humanity and integrity of the patients. They were told they were getting “treatments” when they were merely being studied. They were lied to, treated as objects rather than citizens. This is even more offensive today, now that we have modern legal and ethical rules about informed consent — rules that did not exist when the study was launched. But it was still wrong. But the idea that the Tuskegee experiment somehow validates the deranged, paranoid view that the U.S. government created AIDS to murder African-Americans — in one of the most hideously painful, drawn-out and expensive manners imaginable — is a riot of ridiculousness and a maelstrom of mendacity. And yet, I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve heard guilt-ridden white liberals say exactly that. “Considering what we did at Tuskegee,” they opine, “who can blame them for being distrustful of government?” Well, as a conservative, I have no problem with distrusting government, nor can I fault the descendants of slaves or the victims of Jim Crow for distrusting government more than most.  But why blacks remain the most
reliable voters for the party of
ever-expanding government power is something of a mystery. Indeed, it’s
worth noting that the Tuskegee study, launched under the New Deal, was
symptomatic of arrogant liberal government. The study “emerged out of a
liberal progressive public health movement concerned about the health
and well-being of the African-American population,” writes University
of Chicago professor Richard Schweder. He adds: “The study was done
with the full knowledge, endorsement and participation of
African-American medical professionals, hospitals and research
institutes.”Liberals like to invoke Tuskegee as if it’s solely an indictment of what other people did, proof that we need more progressive government. But Tuskegee was in fact the poisoned fruit of progressive government. A sick irony is that Jeremiah Wright’s lies, and liberal apologies for them, make it more difficult for government to do the job these people want it to do, starting with helping people with AIDS. But that’s only one of many reasons they should be ashamed. |
 |
The "Only Huckabee" voter roll...
Louis D. Gander
| Abdella,Jason
Wade Ablordeppey,Teresa Abney,Samantha Abramski,Chris Adams,Jack Adams, John Adams,Stephen Adamson,Stacy Adcock,Adana Adcock,John Adina,Caskey Adlong,Darla Aguilar,David Aherns,Loren Alarid,Olga Aldrich,Gary Aldrich,Judy Alexander,Debra Alexander,Linda Alexander,Steven Alexandrides,Perry Allen,Angela Allen,Bill Allen,Chris Allen,Cindy Allen,David Allen,Jeff Allen,Katie Allen,Nadine Allen,Randal Allison,Max Allison,Vicke Alponte,MoniQue Alsbrook,Chris Alsup,Angela Alwran,Betty Amador,Joshua Amant,Lance Amato,Josh Ambuehl,Vera Amzehpour,Adele Anderson,David Anderson,Gary R Anderson,Gary Anderson,Scott Anderson,Sheri Anderson,Todd Anderson,Tamara Andrews,Kristen Angel,Larry Anthony,Aleta Anziulewicz,Matthew Anzivino,Freddie Anzivino,Sonya Archer,William Arencibia,Adam Arencibia,Alivia Arencibia,Lazaro Arencibia,Denise Arganbright,Bradley Arkenburg,Aaron Armstrong,Teri Arnhold,Todd Arnold,Charles Aroutiounian,John Asher,Carolyn Asherton,Mary Ashley,Jeri Ashley ,Stephanie Askins,Derek Askins,Rebecca Atchley,Barbara Atchley,Randy Athans,Gaitha Athans,Steve Athans,Steven Atwood,Jerol Auenson,David Avery,Donna Avila,Teresia Baca,Paula Bacaro,Ofelia Backstrom,Jim Baczkiewicz,Jeremy Badtke,Lindsey Badouin,Carol Bailey,Kevin Bailey,Laken Bain,Richard Baker,Elon Baker,Richard Balian,Jean-Paul Ballard,Hal Balts,Brandon Barbusca,Lana Bard,Sharon Barfoot,Marilyn Bargenquast,Sally Barker,Carol Barker,John Barnes,Melita Barrow,Galen Barry,Carol Barton,Eva Bassett,Roxanne Batchelder,Michael Batchelder,Shannon Bates,Keith Bathke,Beverly Bathke,Scott A. Bauer,Eleanor Bauer,Keith Baugher,Joel Baxter,Jessica Bays,Diane Beard,Michael Bedard,Paul Bedard,William Beeman,Forest Beharry,Shawn Bellew,Leigh-Ann Benedict,Dale Benedict,Marti Benjamin,Melanie Bennett,Kpjn Benson,Brenda Berens,Karl Berens,Kelley Berrier,Robbie Berryer,Christian Berryer,Tina Bertolli,Robert Betts,Sheridan Bingham,Wanda Birdwell,Barbara Birks,Bob Birks,Janet Bishop,TruckerRandy Bittner,Sherri Black,Bryan Black,Karen Blackwell,Bill Blake,Carol Blanchard,Carol Bloomer,William Blosfeld,Ann Blount,Bennie Blum,Marilyn Blunt,Bryan Boenigk,Aaron Boersma,Melissa Bogdan,Dan Bogdan,Edmeea Bogdan,Estera Bogdan,Maria Boles,Nicholas Boles,Quetha Boliaux,Dorian Bond,Jill Bonin,Misty Bono,Marijo Bonvillian,Lynne Boring,Crissie Borje,James Borje,Maria Borwey,James Borwey,Katie Bosco,Nick Bouknight,Karen Bowen,Linda Bowman,Connie Bowman,Lynn Bowman,Matt Boyd,Anthony Bradford,Stephanie Brady,Lisa Bramer,Todd Brand,Michelle Brannen,Patricia Branstutter,Cheryl Branstutter,Jeff Braum,Heather Braun,David Brecker,Carly Brehm,Kevin Breland,Charles Brewer,Heather Brewer,John Brewer,Jonathan Brewer,Randal Breidenbach,Ashtin Briggs,Elizabeth Briggs,Michael Brinn,Sherri Bristow,Jaime Bristow,Jeff Britt,Stanley Britton,Jackie Brock,Trudy Brockman,Brian Brooks,Ryane Brotherton,Lydia Brown,Deven Brown,Fritz Brown,Karen Brown,Kristen Brown,Peggy Brown,Regina Brown,Shane Brown,Sharon Brown,Somer Broyles,Catherine Broyles,Linda L. Broyles,Dr. Paul J. Broyles,Paulette Brutus,Lindsey Bryan,Barbara Bryan,Cathy Bryant,Hulen Bryant,Rob Bryant,Rob Bryant,Timothy Brye,Kelly Brye,Loimata Bucklaw,Bonnie Budai,Ludovic Buddenhagen,Lori Buffett,Matthew Buhrman,Leta Bunyan,Lisa Burba,Scott Burbank,Daniel Burgess,Garry Burhans,Thelma Burkott,Collin Burnett,Natalya Burns,James Burns,Kimberly Burns,Lisa Burns,Thomas B. Burt,John Burt,Zach Burtonf,Donna Bussey,Denise Butler,Janet Butler,Mark Butner,Joey Butt,Amanda Butt,Lee Butzberger,Michael Bydlon,Deborah Byers,Jennifer Byrd,Lance Byron,Robin Caffey,Kay Cagle,Harold Cain,Angelia Caine,Brian Calabro,Madeleine Calin,Andrei Calkins,Karen Calvert,Ann Calvert,William Camp,Dennis Camp,Keith Camp,Leah Camp,Lisa Camp,Lisa Campbell,Daniel Campbell,Daniel Campbell,Hilary Campbell,Howard Campbell,Will Campese,Bev Canady,Debbie Canavan,Tom Candelora,Chris Cansler,Carolyn Cantrell,Brittany Cantrell,Walter Cara,Nancy Carbonell,Robert Cardwell,Kimberly Carey,Robert Cariker,Frances Cariker,LeighAnn Carlin,Gabriel Carlin,Joyce Carlisle,Nancy Carlson,M. Carlstrom,Derek Carlton,John Carlton,Mellaree Carnes,Kay Caron,Anthony Caron,Brett Caron,Joan Caron,Michael Carpenter,Catherine Carpenter,Deb Carr,Karen Carr,Terry Carroll,Clay Carroll,Lori Cartabona,Louis Carter,Michele Casillas,Mike Castlebury,Stacey Castorina,Debbie Castrillon,Anthony Caswell,April Caswell,R Catello,Nik Catey,Cathy Catlin,Rhonda Cavanagh,Carla Cefaly,David Cercone,Emily Chace,Donald Chace,Kenneth Chalvet,Anne Chambers,Jason Chambers,Jeannie Chambers,Jeremy Chambers,Lisa Chambers,Tom Chance,Eunice Chandle,Joseph Chandler,Ron Chantnacran,Christina Chantnacran,Mikei Charvet,Dominic Chapel,Ruth Chapman,Christina Chatman,Cate Chen,Benjamin Chen,Eric Chen,Jean Chen,Mary Chevalier,Evelyn Chevalier,Jerry Chevalier,Lori Chitwood,Stephen Chong,Elizabeth Christensen,Darrel Christensen,Kay Christian,Elizabeth Chupp,Carol Chupp,Mark Churchman,Millie Churchman,Steve Ciarapica,Kevin Cicak,Ryan Clark,Barbara Clark,Dee Clark,James Clark,Richard Clark,Taylor Clark,Todd Click,S. S. Cline,Clint Cline,Nanette Clinger,Kevin Cloud,Therese Cobo,Angel Cockerham,Grace Coetzer,Johan |
Coil,L Coil,Larry Coil,Leah Coil,M Coil,Marjorie Coil,Matthew Coker,Joel Cole 3rd,Edward Cole,Jennifer Collins,Bea Collins,Lori Collins,Natalie Collins,Tangie Collmer,Sheryl Colon,Amber Colter,Mark Columbus,Carrie Combes,Raymond Combs,Angelia Comer,Amanda Compalas,Anderson Conder,Sarah Cone,David Conklin,Jay Connelly,Carole Conner,Ava Conrad,Cindy Concetti,Carlos Convirs,Levi Cook,Glenn Cook,Jodi Cook,Karen Cook,Karen Cook,Lance Cook,Marci Cook,Mark Cook,Mark Cook,Nora Cook,Randy Cook,Rebekah Cook,Rena Cook,Sherilea Cook,Vernon Cooksey,Bobby Cooksey,Jackie Cooper, Jennifer Copenhaver,Ricky Copley,Jerry Corbett,Steven Corder,Nelda Corey,Andrew Cornelius,Kristy Cosgrove,Lindy Coughlin,Jack Courson,Frances Courtney,Lynn Couturier,Gloria Cowart,Cheryl Cox,Dale Cox,Deana Cox,Ilene (Lenah) Cox,Jack Cox,Margaret Cox,Margie Cox,Norma Cox,Sue Cox-Tumlin,Terry Ann Crabtree,Allen Craig,Betty Craig,Jason Cramer,Dan Cramer,Mary Sue Crane,Dean Crawley,Brandon Creanga,Ioan Crepeaux,Larry Crespo,David Cribbs,G. Donald Crichton,Jenny Crider,Beverly Crilly,Joanna Criswell,Carol Crocker,Jess Croft,Tricia Crognale,John Crognale,Linda Cromer,Joan Croonquist,Elizabeth Cross,Scott Crow,Keith Crowder,Marcia Cruz,Jorge Cruz,Mary Culp,Alan Culp,Vicki Cummings,Jonathan Cunningham,David Cunningham,Eric Cunningham,Zella Curry,Oweda Cusick Turner,Ellen Dahl,Frank Dailey,Helen Daniels,James Dang,Jeffrey Dang,Karen Dannel,Karen Dark,Jeanette Dark,Ryan Darnall,Brian Darnall,Melissa Darnell,Braden Davenport,Rita Davidson,Dennis S. Davidson,Nathaniel Davies,Scott Davinroy,Justin Davis,Angela Davis,Dale Davis,Diana Davis,Durwin Davis,James L. Jr. Davis,Megan Davis,Randy Davis,Shirley Dawbin,Tyler Day,Bradley Day,ML Debbie,M. Debenport,Dan DeChello,Steven DeCola,Mandy DeFord,Celeste Degaetano,Catherine Degaetano,Nita Delacruz,Arturo De La Cruz,Jaime De La Cruz,Lisa Delacruz,Lynnette Delacruz,Romeo DeLange,Matt De La Paz,John De La Paz,Joy Delgado,Pedro A Dellaero,Paulette DeLozier,Angela Denker,Mike DeVenuto,Frank DeVenuto,Nancy Denker,Angel Detweiler,Jimella Devers,Nathan de Vroede,Orah Deweber,Jason Dibbens,Brenda Dickerson,Reggie DiGiacinto,Dawn Dismounts,Dan Dixon,Donnette Dixon,Vickie Doddato,Rachael Dodds,Ann Doerr,Michele Dohner,Fred Donaldson,Brenda Doohan,Bridgette Doohan,Colleen Dooley,Bart Dooley,Gail Dorer,Joseph Dorsey,Jim Dougherty,Kim Douglas,Steve Dowd,Brenda Dowd,James Dowell,Dennis Doyle,Gary Doyle,Lisa Doyle,Melinda Doyle,Melissa Doyle,Tim Driskell,Lance Drummond,Dee Dubyne,Sue DuCharme,Anne Dudeck,Marty Dufft,Audrey Duffy,Michele Duke,Beth Dunagan,Laura Duncan,Russell Duncan,Tiffany Duris,M Barbara Dupont,Carol Dye,Ben Eastlake,Fred Eaton,LaDonna Eaton, Sherri Ebey,Janet Edge, Jack Edwards,Brittney Edwards,Dan Edwards,Linda Eggleton,Dorothy Eill,David Eill Jr.,Paul Eill,Paula Elbert,Tom Elder,Kelsey Eldridge,Brandon Eldridge,Donald Elkins,Helen Elkins,Katy Elliott,Deborah Elliott,William Emerson,Lisbeth Engebretson,Michael England,Cheryl Ervin,Scott Espero,Alyanna Espero,Diana Estes,Patricia Eugene,Dominique Evans,Mary Evans,Tamara Evans,Virginia Evenson,Kristine Everidge,Frances Everson,Berringer Ezell,Dan Famularo,Willhelmina Fant,Ben Farah,Jenifer Farinola,David Farr,Harrison Farr,Tricia Farran,Donna Feeny,Sarah Felsecker,Barbara Feltner,Joan Fenton,Steve Ferrell-Brooksbank,Linda Ferreyra,Rev. Homero Feo,Nimfa Feo,Ralph Ferguson,Jennifer Ferguson,William Fern,Carl Ferreyra,Rev. Jennifer Ferris,Robert Fetters,Jennifer Fetters,Pamela Figueroa,Jorge Fike,Leah Finch,Shirley Finkel,Linda Firebaugh,Rick Firebaugh,Tracie Fish,Michael Fitzpatrick,Bill Fitzpatrick,Bill Fitzpatrick,Carolyn Faye Fix,John Flaherty,Michael Flaherty,Mike Flake,Barbara Flanagan,Susan Flannery,Mike Flannery,Sheila Flatt,Rose Fletcher,Courtney Flory,Hannah Flowers,Harold Floyd,Donna Floyd,Mike Folden,Kathy Ford,Annette Ford,George E. Ford,Kristin Foreman,Brandy Foreman,Mike Foreman,Raymon Forrester,Randy Fox,Eric Francisca,Cardona Franke,Letty Franklin,Jenna Franklin,John Frazier,G M Frazier,Lisa Frazier,Neal Frazier,Pam Freestone,Sandra Frederick,Cindy Friesen,Gregory Friesen,Holly Fudge,Joshua Fudge,Kristen Fudge,Mary Fuentes,Henoch Fullerton,Theresa Gadbois,Tammy Gallegos,Allison Gander,Carol Gander,Don Gander,Doris Gander,Gaylord Gander,Louis Gander,Mary Gander,Ruth Garbarino,Jay Garber,Pamm Garcia,Miguel Garcia,Nelson Garcia,Nidia Gardiner,William Garrett,Ron Garrison,Bert Garon,Neal Garon,Teresa Gary,Robert Gaspa,Kellie Gaspa,Steve Gassman,Mary JoEll Gatchel,Nancy Gatewood,Shana Gatliff,John Gaulke,Patrick Geist,Bill Geist,Marty Gentili,Kristen George,Brandon George,Christina Geraghty,Lisa Gernentz,Michelle Giannakakis,Jim Gibbs,Carol Gibson, Hon. John Gieger,Robert Gifford,Kathryn Gilbert,Susan Glance,Loretta Goemaat,Ralph Goergen,Shelly Goetz,Violine Gomez,Valentine Gonzalez,David Gonzalez,Mike Gonzalez,Olivia Gonzalez,Vivian Goode,Amy Goode,Vickie Goode,Wayne Goodloe,Douglas Gordon,Deborah Gorin,John Gorman,Paula Gosnell,Alison Gosnell,Dustin Gosnell,Greg Gosnell,Lynn Gosper,Aaron Gosper,Amanda Gosper,Michael Gosper,Robin Grafmiller,Geri |
Gray,Randy Green,Mildred Green,Nathan Greenwood,Cheryl Greer,Mark Grewell,Vicky Grimes,Jodi Grimm,Shirley Grimmett,Denise Grobbel,Tracey Grubb,Gregory Gulmatico,Amber Gurnee,Julia Guthrie,Diane Habig,Janalyn Haag,Eileen Haagensen,Danny Haagensen,Elise Haagensen,John Haasch,Laura Habig,Joseph Hackler,Connie Haessig,Susan Haga,James M Hagan,Verna Haggarty,Chapelle Hale,Amy Hale,Anthony Hale,Kevin Hall,Carl Hall,Celina Hall,Dorcas Hall,Hunter Hall,Jane Hall,Jeffrey Hall,Joy Hall,Judy Hall,Phil Hall,Nate Hall,Nathan Hall,Stephen Hall,Vaughn Hallgren,James Hambright,Michael Hamilton,Suzanne Hamsley,Chad Hamsley,Hannah Hampton,Russell Handley,Thomas Hane,John Hansen,Lila Hansen,Stephen Hanson,Debra Hardesty,Jennifer Hardesty,Mark Harding,Debra Harding,Gary Harding,Timothy Hargesheimer,Dean Hargesheimer,Pamela Harke,Ann Harke,Gary Harke,Vince Harms,Diane Harness,Mel Harney,Monica Harrell,Belinda Harrell,Jerry Harrell,Sandra Harrenstein,Aimee Harrington,Brian Harrington,Linda Harris,Brenda Harris,Jill Suzanne Harris,Kevin Harrison,Kevin Hart,Grace Hart,Kim Hart,Kim Hart,Linda Hartman,Catherine Hartman,Dan Hartman,Patricia Hartsuch,Mary Lou Haskins,Phyllis Hatcher,Kimberly Haupt,Susan Hawk,Suzanne Hawthorne,Jessa Hayes,Kristopher Hayes,Albert Hayes,Kimberly Hayes,Linda Hayes,Regina Hays,Caleb Hays,Candice Hays,Danny Hays,Pamela Heape,Teresa Heathman,Debra Heckerman,Sally Heesch,Elaine Heesch,Miles Hefty,Rich Heidt,Allen Heidt,Karla Heikki |